Tuesday 1 March 2016

Cuckservative Christian university president in the state of Washington supports "immigrant" invasion

And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; Acts 17:26

Since early 2015, the term "cuckservative" has become popular. I don't think there's a dictionary definition yet, but I'm inclined to define a cuckservative as someone who claims to be, or is identified as, conservative, but who considers it more important to be seen as not racist, sexist, "homophobic," or [insert politically correct pejorative here] by people who don't like him, rather than to take a principled conservative stand. I put Joseph Castleberry in this category. Mr. Castleberry is described in a Seattle Times headline as a "leading conservative Christian," although I imagine relatively few people have ever heard of him. As reported by Nina Shapiro of the Seattle Times, February 6, 2016 (bold in original):

“I’m going to have Mexican grandchildren and I can’t wait!”

Joseph Castleberry, president of evangelical Northwest University in Kirkland, and a conservative who counts Ronald Reagan as one of his political heroes, has a lot of surprises up his sleeve, including this. One of his three daughters, he told the crowd at an Auburn luncheon, is married to a Mexican American. He beamed.

Castleberry delightedly defies expectations, even while challenging you to think about why you have those expectations in the first place. Yes, he is a 55-year-old white Republican who unabashedly supports immigrants — even, to some extent, immigrants who are here illegally — because of the spiritual, cultural and economic revitalization he says they bring to the United States.

That makes him an anomaly this political season. Republican presidential candidates — prodded by Donald Trump, who early on said he would build a “great wall” to stop Mexico from sending rapists and other criminals here and later proposed a ban on Muslims entering the country — launched into a competition over who could take the hardest line on immigration.

Little has changed in the wake of Iowa’s Republican caucuses, with Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, propounding a “wall that works,” riding the evangelical vote to victory.

Yet Castleberry contends there’s nothing inherently anti-immigrant about conservatism, and certainly not about evangelicalism. He strikes out at “nativist” rhetoric, as he calls it, in his book, “The New Pilgrims: How Immigrants are Renewing America’s Faith and Values,” released last fall in English and Spanish.

He aimed the book at conservative audiences and lucked out in terms of timing.

“I had no idea the issue was going to be as hot as it was,” he said. Some 70 talk-radio programs across the country, along with Fox News and various other TV outlets, have interviewed him. He has also been speaking at churches and Rotary clubs, like the one that co-sponsored the Auburn event.

“Who is doing the greater danger to the rule of law?” he asked at the luncheon. “Immigrants? Or a Congress who knows the system is broken and won’t fix the laws or enforce them?”

Despite the occasional chiding, Castleberry, generally upbeat and inclined toward old-fashioned courtesy learned from his Southern upbringing, mainly expounds upon the positive contributions of immigrants.

Through intermarriage, he said, immigrants infuse the culture with their family values, tempering an individualism that “tends to get out of control in America.”

They are also more likely to start businesses than native-born Americans, he asserts, “whether they be eBay and Google or the local taco truck.” (eBay was started by French-born Pierre Omidyar, and Russian immigrant Sergey Brin co-founded Google.)

Some of his most passionate reasoning concerns the nation’s spiritual life. “A palpable sense of decline hangs over many sectors of American Christianity like winter clouds,” he writes. And he sees immigrants, who are overwhelmingly religious, and often ardently so, as the sunshine breaking through.

He writes admiringly about immigrant churches like the 1,500-strong, Spanish-language Centro de Vida church in Tacoma. Castleberry speaks there regularly, in Spanish.

“He says that Jesus himself was an immigrant,” laughed Peruvian-born senior pastor Roberto Tejada.

“A child racist”

Castleberry honed his Spanish, and deepened his relationship with its speakers, during 20 years in Latin America. He spent them in periodic stints, including one teaching Greek, Hebrew and the New Testament at Christian University of the Assemblies of God in El Salvador.

His international bent is far from unique in the Pentecostal movement, of which the Assemblies of God is a part. James Wellman, chairman of the University of Washington’s comparative religion program, and a onetime fellow divinity student with Castleberry at Princeton University, pointed out that Pentecostalism has seen tremendous growth in Latin America and Africa.

“Many Pentecostals have a broader and deeper commitment to equality than most liberal Protestants,” said Wellman, who authored the 2008 book “Evangelical vs. Liberal: The Clash of Christian Cultures in the Pacific Northwest.” He noted that liberal Protestantism is a mainly “white movement.”

Northwest University is affiliated with the Assemblies of God, and accepts only professed Christians into its undergraduate program. Castleberry came to the school of roughly 2,000 in 2007.

In his office, housed in the Seahawks’ former headquarters and overlooking the athletic fields, the president explained his pro-immigrant feelings are also linked to growing up in what was then “one of the most racist communities in America”: the small Alabama town of Demopolis.

The son of a paper-mill worker, he recalled his “career as a child racist,” going door to door during the civil-rights era to get support for an anti-busing campaign. He radically changed his mindset after being bused to an African-American school and making his first black friend.

“When you grow up in a sewer, you know what it smells like,” he said, citing the “racist tones” he hears in the current talk about immigrants.

He observed that Republicans will have to get past this if they want to recruit immigrant voters. That was a primary goal expressed after the last presidential election, when GOP nominee Mitt Romney’s famous comment about “self-deportation” cost him the Latino vote, and arguably the election.

“It’s not a fixed law of nature that immigrants have to become Democrats,” Castleberry said. He noted, like Republican analysts after the 2012 election, that many immigrants are socially conservative.

Maybe so, but some conservatives remain suspicious. “Do they vote their values?” asked KTTH 770 AM talk-radio host Todd Herman after having Castleberry on his program last fall. “It doesn’t appear they do.”

In the end, said Chris Vance, a Republican challenger this year to Democratic U.S. Sen. Patty Murray, and a supporter of comprehensive immigration reform, “the people in the party who wanted to reach out to Hispanics got shouted down by the people who don’t.”

Losing the culture wars

And there’s never more shouting than when it comes to specific policies, which divide even people who welcome immigrants into their religious fold.

“For me as a Christian American, to be hostile to people from other places is to violate my spiritual mandate,” said Joe Fuiten, pastor emeritus of Cedar Park Church in Bothell, which has had thriving Iranian, Japanese and Spanish wings.

Yet Fuiten supports building a wall on the border “if that’s what it takes” to keep illegal and dangerous immigrants out, and views Muslims with particular wariness.

While recognizing that Islam “has a problem” with terrorism, Castleberry, in contrast, said he and his friends see Muslims primarily as “neighbors that they want to share the gospel with.”

As for illegal immigration, the university president criticized President Obama’s executive order halting deportations for roughly 5 million people living here in the shadows — an order the U.S. Supreme Court announced in January it will review. Yet, Castleberry’s critique lies in his belief that the president exceeded his authority, not in the order’s substance, with which he is sympathetic.

That’s heresy in some conservative circles, where the order is viewed as an outrageous “bureaucratic fiat,” in Herman’s words. Added the talk-show host, “We’re talking about people who broke a law.”

Castleberry concedes the point, which is why he said he’s not in favor of “amnesty.” Yet he said the U.S. is guilty, too — of a “moral dishonesty” that seeks to punish immigrants who are in the country illegally while at the same time taking advantage of their labor.

Consequently, he said, deportation is too harsh a punishment, preferring the idea of a fine.

A number of evangelical leaders across the country are on the same page. Along with Castleberry, many are part of an Evangelical Immigration Table, which lays out a set of principles, including allowing immigrants a path toward legalization.

That would seem to set the stage for evangelicals — known for conservative stances on issues such as abortion, prayer in the schools and same-sex marriage — to exert a different kind of political influence.

Yet, the Cruz win in Iowa suggests that rank-and-file evangelicals may differ with their leaders on immigration. “Sometimes social class values will outweigh religious perspectives,” Castleberry said, adding, “some, not all, working-class white people are taking the bait to blame immigrants for the so-called disappearance of the middle class.”

Whatever their views, evangelicals may do little more than vote. This generation has largely backed away from politics, according to Castleberry. Jerry Falwell’s Moral Majority, he noted, is defunct.

He explained it this way: “The culture wars are already over, and evangelical Christians lost.”

“It’s not what it was,” agreed Vance, speaking of the evangelical force in politics. He said back when Ellen Craswell ran for governor as the Republican nominee in 1996, speaking about “God’s plan” for Washington, “you saw people coming to Republican party meetings with Bibles.” Those people have dropped out, replaced by Tea Partiers bringing copies of the U.S. Constitution.

Castleberry isn’t exactly trying to get evangelicals back into politics. But he is trying to change hearts and minds.

And he had some success at least with Roger Tyson, a retired physician who doesn’t identify with any party but leans conservative. After Castleberry gave his speech in Auburn last month, Tyson walked up to the university president and asked tough questions, including about immigrants taking away American jobs.

Castleberry cited a 2015 study showing that immigrants, by increasing consumer demand, actually create jobs — on average 1.2 per immigrant.

“He had a really good response,” Tyson conceded afterward, noticeably impressed.
I don't disagree with everything Mr. Castleberry says. I agree with him that evangelicals have lost the culture wars; but then, those are wars that God hasn't called us to fight. Christians are called to contend for the faith once delivered unto the saints (Jude 3), not the culture. When Mr. Castleberry asks the rhetorical question about whether immigrants or Congress are more to blame for problems surrounding immmigration, he raises a good point; I suggest both are to blame. I notice, though, in typical cuckservative fashion, he decries as "nativism" what others might call traditional Americans wanting to preserve their country. In the world of multiculturalism, it's okay for other nations to want to preserve their identity, but nations composed of traditionally white peoples aren't entitled to do likewise, and when they do, it's called "racism" or "nativism."

Promoters of "immigrant" invasion within Christian circles are fond of quoting the first part of Acts 17:26, but not the last part. At the time of the tower of Babel, it really was "one world," but it united in rebellion against God:

And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.
And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there.
And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for mortar.
And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.
And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded.
And the Lord said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.
Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech.
So the Lord scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.
Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the Lord did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the Lord scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth.
Genesis 11:1-9

This was the first recorded instance where the world came together as one, and God responded by splitting the world up into various nations; and that's the way He wants to keep it, until the Lord Jesus Christ returns to set up his millennial kingdom. As Mark Steyn put it, diversity is great for the world, but not for a country.

There are two other occasions mentioned in Scripture where the world comes together as one: at the end of the Tribulation when the Lord Jesus Christ returns to Earth (Revelation 19:19), and at the end of the Millennium when Satan is loosed and allowed to deceive the nations, and they gather together to battle (Revelation 20:7-9). In every case, the world "coming together as one" is always a movement against God, not a movement by Him.

Vox Day, at his Vox Popoli blog, has a large number of excellent posts on the subject of immigration. For those inclined to be taken in by Mr. Castleberry's arguments, I suggest going to Mr. Day's blog and searching posts under the labels "immigration," "invasion," "Clash of Civilizations," "Vibrancy is our strength," "SJW," and "cuckservative."

To say that Jesus was an immigrant is incorrect. Joseph, Mary, and Jesus fled to Egypt during the time that King Herod of Judea was seeking Jesus in order to kill him, but that was just until Herod died, and then the family returned to Nazareth, where they remained (Matthew 2:13-23).

Mr. Castleberry complains that deportation of illegal immigrants is too harsh a measure, and supports a "path toward legalization." It should be kept in mind that illegal immigrants are just that--people who've broken the law to get into the country. I don't think people who illegally enter a country should be entitled to citizenship. I presume from Mr. Castleberry's attitude that if a stranger invaded his home and set up residence, that Mr. Castleberry would accommodate him and treat him as though he were a member of his own family with all the rights and privileges that go with that.

With his comments that "Sometimes social class values will outweigh religious perspectives" and “some, not all, working-class white people are taking the bait to blame immigrants for the so-called disappearance of the middle class,” Mr. Castleberry shows no empathy for the people who comprise a sizeable portion, and probably the majority, of the people of his own area. "Social class values" sounds like Social Justice Warrior-speak for the natural desire for and concern for people to be able to support themselves and their families. Mr. Castleberry probably has no immediate fear of losing his job to a foreigner (file that under "scenes we'd like to see"). He shows his contempt for working-class white people by referring to the "so-called disappearance of the middle class." The disappearance of the middle class in the United States is real, as reported in the following items from former U.S. deputy Treasury Secretary Dr. Paul Craig Roberts:

A Reader Reports From The Jobs Front (February 8, 2016)

Reader’s Report on Dire Situation in Southern Illinois (February 8, 2016)

Reader reports on job situation in Ohio (February 9, 2016)

I especially refer the reader to this article by Carolyn May of Breitbart, about a white man who was one of hundreds of middle-class workers who lost their jobs to foreigners--and were forced to train their replacements:

Laid Off Disney Worker Breaks Down in Tears Before Senate Panel (February 25, 2016)

Finally, I find it interesting to note that Mr. Castleberry refers to the grandchildren his daughter and her Mexican American husband are expecting as "Mexican grandchildren"--he didn't say "American."

The bottom line: Never trust cuckservatives; in practice, they're indistinguishable from liberals.

No comments:

Post a Comment